Zurück zu den Herausforderungen
Mittel 0 gelöst 0% Erfolgsquote

Mini-Batch Gradient Descent

Train a linear model by updating the weights after every small batch of samples instead of the whole dataset.

Das lernst du

  • Split data into batches
  • Update weights after each batch
  • Compare batch, mini-batch and stochastic training

Problem

Übersetzung anzeigen

Mini-batch gradient descent is how almost every neural network is trained: split the data into small batches and update the weights after each one.

Train y = w × x + b on the mean squared error, starting from w = 0 and b = 0. In each epoch, split the samples in order into batches of batch_size (the last batch may be smaller). For each batch of size n:

  1. errorᵢ = w × xᵢ + b - yᵢ for each sample in the batch
  2. dw = (2 / n) × Σ errorᵢ × xᵢ and db = (2 / n) × Σ errorᵢ
  3. w ← w - learning_rate × dw and b ← b - learning_rate × db

Implement train_mini_batch(xs, ys, batch_size, learning_rate, epochs).

Input

xs, ys: The data points (same length).

batch_size: Samples per batch.

learning_rate, epochs: The step size and the number of passes over the data.

Output

Return [w, b] after training.

Einschränkungen

1 ≤ number of points ≤ 1,000, 1 ≤ batch_size ≤ number of points, 0 ≤ epochs ≤ 1,000

0 < learning_rate ≤ 1

-100 ≤ each value ≤ 100

Beispiele

Beispiel 1
Eingabe:
xs = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]
ys = [2.0, 4.0, 6.0]
epochs = 1
batch_size = 2
learning_rate = 0.1

Erwartete Ausgabe:
expected = [2.44, 1.08]
Eingabe:
std::vector<double> xs = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
std::vector<double> ys = {2.0, 4.0, 6.0};
long long epochs = 1;
long long batch_size = 2;
double learning_rate = 0.1;

Erwartete Ausgabe:
std::vector<double> expected = {2.44, 1.08};
Eingabe:
double[] xs = new double[] {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
double[] ys = new double[] {2.0, 4.0, 6.0};
long epochs = 1;
long batch_size = 2;
double learning_rate = 0.1;

Erwartete Ausgabe:
double[] expected = new double[] {2.44, 1.08};

Erläuterung

Batch 1 is x = [1, 2]: errors -2 and -4, dw = -10, db = -6, so w = 1 and b = 0.6. Batch 2 is x = [3] alone: error 1×3 + 0.6 - 6 = -2.4, dw = 2 × (-2.4) × 3 = -14.4 and db = -4.8, so w = 2.44 and b = 1.08. Result: [2.44, 1.08].

Beispiel 2
Eingabe:
xs = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0]
ys = [3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0]
epochs = 1
batch_size = 4
learning_rate = 0.05

Erwartete Ausgabe:
expected = [1.75, 0.6]
Eingabe:
std::vector<double> xs = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0};
std::vector<double> ys = {3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0};
long long epochs = 1;
long long batch_size = 4;
double learning_rate = 0.05;

Erwartete Ausgabe:
std::vector<double> expected = {1.75, 0.6};
Eingabe:
double[] xs = new double[] {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0};
double[] ys = new double[] {3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0};
long epochs = 1;
long batch_size = 4;
double learning_rate = 0.05;

Erwartete Ausgabe:
double[] expected = new double[] {1.75, 0.6};

Erläuterung

A batch as big as the dataset is ordinary batch gradient descent: one update per epoch. Result: [1.75, 0.6].

So gehst du vor

Versuch es zuerst allein und öffne dann einen Hinweis nach dem anderen.

Hinweis 1

Process the samples in the given order, updating the parameters after every batch instead of after every single point.

Hinweis 2

For each batch, compute prediction errors first, then use their averages with x values to get the two gradients.

Hinweis 3

The last batch may be smaller than the others, so its gradient scaling must use that batch's size.

Erwartete Komplexität

O(epochs × n) time, O(1) extra space

Referenzen

Diese Aufgabe wurde für CodeUtility angepasst. Beachte die oben genannten Vorgaben und Einschränkungen.

Von anderen lernen

Community-Lösungen

Noch keine veröffentlichten Lösungen. Löse die Aufgabe und teile als Erster eine Lösung.